Trump’s legal team says Supreme Court would be ‘stunned’ by hush money case in New York’s hands - Appeals court judges are now wrestling with a ‘whole new world of presidential immunity’ after his con

The president’s lawyers argued that a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity justified moving an appeal of his conviction in Manhattan to U.S. jurisdiction.

Five months after President Donald Trump was sentenced without penalty in the New York hush money case, his attorneys will square off again with prosecutors Wednesday in one of the first major tests of the Supreme Court’s landmark presidential immunity decision.

University of Chicago Law School 1111 East 60th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637 773.702.9494

The judges in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals spent more than an hour grilling Trump’s lawyer and the appellate chief for Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted the case.

President Donald Trump's Justice Department is not happy with Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan's legal defense in their criminal case against her. According to The New York Times, prosecutors rejected her claim that she has immunity for acts carried out in her official capacity — an argument for which Dugan cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v.

Judge Hannah C. Dugan was indicted last month on charges of concealing a person from arrest and obstruction of proceedings. She has pleaded not guilty.

As President Donald Trump focuses on global trade deals and dispatching troops to aid his immigration crackdown, his lawyers are fighting to erase the hush money criminal conviction that punctuated his reelection campaign last year and made him the first former -- and now current -- U.